CRITICALApt
Global

How botnet-driven DDoS attacks evolved in 2H 2025

·Source: CSO Online

Updated:

Executive Summary

The second half of 2025 marked a pivotal shift in the world of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks . Organizations across the globe faced a perfect storm: Artificial intelligence (AI) matured as an offensive weapon, botnet infrastructure reached new heights with multiterabit attack capacity, and DDoS-for-hire services became more accessible—even to nontechnical adversaries. NETSCOUT’s ATL

Analysis

The second half of 2025 marked a pivotal shift in the world of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks . Organizations across the globe faced a perfect storm: Artificial intelligence (AI) matured as an offensive weapon, botnet infrastructure reached new heights with multiterabit attack capacity, and DDoS-for-hire services became more accessible—even to nontechnical adversaries. NETSCOUT’s ATLAS global threat intelligence platform, which monitored more than 8 million DDoS attacks in 203 countries and territories during this period, reveals a threat landscape where the line between intent and capability has all but disappeared. Attacks reaching up to 30 terabits per second are now possible, and conversational AI interfaces are guiding even unskilled attackers through complex operations. Executive summary Between July and December 2025, the number of DDoS attacks remained steady compared to the first half of the year—but the nature of these attacks changed dramatically: Massive attack capacity: Demonstration attacks peaked at 30Tbps and 4 gigapackets per second, primarily launched by Internet of Things (IoT) botnets such as Aisuru and TurboMirai variants. AI integration: The use of AI, including dark-web large language models (LLMs), moved from emerging trend to operational reality, making sophisticated attacks accessible to a wider range of threat actors. Persistent threat actors: Despite international law enforcement efforts, hacktivist groups and commodity botnets maintained high pressure. For example, NoName057(16) claimed more than 200 attacks in July alone, showing resilience even after infrastructure seizures. Critical infrastructure under pressure: DNS root servers and Network Time Protocol (NTP) services faced relentless attacks, with more than 45,000 NTP-related alerts. Well-architected systems proved resilient, but the persistence of threats was clear. Targeted sectors and regions: Government, finance, telecom, transportation, and hospitality were the most targeted sectors. Regionally, EMEA led with 3.3 million attacks, followed by APAC, North America, and Latin America. The latter half of 2025 was not just an evolutionary step, but a fundamental shift in who can launch sophisticated DDoS attacks, how quickly they adapt, and the scale of impact they can achieve. Key findings 1. Global scale and attack volume More than 8 million DDoS attacks were recorded across 203 countries and territories, highlighting the persistent and growing operational risk for digitally connected organizations worldwide. The attack count remained stable compared to the first half of the year, but the nature and sophistication of attacks changed dramatically. 2. Rise of IoT botnets and outbound risk Massive direct-path attacks in 2025 demonstrated that compromised customer-premises equipment (CPE) can generate outbound floods exceeding 1Tbps, creating significant liability and service-availability risks for broadband providers. The TurboMirai class of IoT botnets, including Aisuru and Eleven11 (RapperBot), emerged as a major force, capable of launching attacks up to 30Tbps and 4Gpps. Eleven11 alone was linked to more than 3,600 DDoS events between 2021 and mid-2025. 3. AI-enhanced DDoS-for-hire services DDoS-for-hire platforms are now integrating dark-web LLMs and conversational AI, lowering the technical barrier for launching complex, multivector attacks. Even unskilled threat actors can now orchestrate sophisticated campaigns using natural-language prompts, increasing risk for all industries. 4. Threat actor collaboration and scale July 2025 saw a surge of more than 20,000 botnet-driven attacks, with coordinated threat activity overwhelming defenses and disrupting essential services in government, finance, and transportation. Groups such as Keymous+ demonstrated how partnerships between threat actors can amplify attack power, with collaborative events reaching up to 44Gbps. 5. Critical infrastructure under sustained pressure High-value services such as DNS root servers and NTP faced continuous attack pressure. At least 38 significant DNS root events were recorded, including a 21Gbps flood against the A root server. More than 45,000 NTP-related attack alerts were generated, underscoring the need for resilient, globally distributed architectures and robust mitigation strategies. 6. Geographic and sectoral targeting The most targeted sectors were government agencies, financial services, telecommunications, transportation, and hospitality. Regionally, EMEA led with 3.3 million attacks, followed by APAC (1.9 million), North America (1.27 million), and Latin America (1.01 million). 7. Multivector and carpet-bombing attacks More than half of all attacks were multivector, with 42 percent using two to five vectors. Carpet-bombing attacks increased, averaging between 750 and 830 per day in the latter half of 2025. Attackers frequently blended methods such as DNS amplification, SSDP, SNMP, mDNS, memcached, CLDAP, and mixed TCP floods to maximize disruption. 8. Defensive successes and ongoing challenges Well-architected systems, especially those using anycast-based defenses, demonstrated resilience and maintained high availability despite continuous attack pressure. However, the persistence of vulnerable devices and the rapid adaptation of threat actors mean that organizations must remain vigilant and proactive in their defense strategies. Conclusion The DDoS threat landscape in late 2025 was defined by sustained global attack volume, increasingly capable IoT botnets, sophisticated threat-actor campaigns, and a decisive move toward AI-enhanced DDoS-for-hire operations. Although the largest attacks remain rare, they continue to shape defensive strategies. The average attack is now short, intense, and multisector, targeting a wide range of industries and geographies. Organizations must recognize that the democratization of attack tools, especially with AI integration, has lowered the barrier to entry for cybercriminals. Defending against these threats requires not just robust infrastructure, but also adaptive, intelligence-driven strategies that can keep pace with the evolving tactics of adversaries. To learn more, read NETSCOUT’s 2H 2025 DDoS Threat Intelligence Report
Source Attribution

Originally published by CSO Online on Apr 8, 2026.

Related Threats

MEDIUMVulnerability

Top Five Compliance Audit Software and Tools: Mastering Modern Regulatory Risk

Executive Summary Manual audit preparation no longer scales across hybrid, cloud, endpoint, and application environments. Compliance monitoring software must move from checklist validation to continuous control monitoring. The strongest platforms connect evidence collection with risk prioritization, remediation ownership, and executive reporting. Qualys differentiates itself by enabling continuous

Qualys Blog
LOWSupply Chain

AI adoption and business acceleration are changing the expectations of technology risk management

As AI becomes embedded in customer experiences, internal workflows, and throughout the supply chain, security leaders are being asked to do more than manage risk. They are being asked to help the business make more informed decisions and move faster. At the same time, AI has evolved faster than the programs built to govern it. The result is a widening gap between the pace of transformation and the

CSO Online
CRITICALAi

SOCs face a human challenge as AI speeds alerts and threats

Security operations centers (SOCs) have spent years struggling under the weight of growing alert volumes, expanding attack surfaces, and chronic staffing shortages. Now artificial intelligence is adding a new complication: not just more information, but more machine-generated information that must itself be evaluated. “There is an asymmetry here because you now have to parse through a lot of AI sl

CSO Online